To Comply With Federal Law, Restraining Order Information
To Be Removed From Branch Website
Effective Monday, Dec. 3, 2007, and in accordance with federal
law, information identifying a party protected by a restraining
order will no longer be available through the civil/family
look-up section of the Judicial Branch’s website. This
federal prohibition does not extend to disclosable information
in a file at a court clerk’s office.
Under a 2006 amendment to the
Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2005, no state,
Indian tribe of territory “shall make available publicly on the
Internet any information regarding the registration or filing of
a protection order, restraining order, or injunction in either
the issuing or enforcing State, tribal, or territorial
jurisdiction, if such publication would be likely to publicly
reveal the identity or location of the party protected under
such order.”
Congress in August 2006
further amended the provision by substituting “the registration,
filing of a petition for, or issuance of (emphasis
added)” a restraining order.
“We learned that we likely
were not in compliance with this amendment to the federal law,”
Chief Court Administrator Barbara Quinn said. “Following a legal
opinion from our Legal Services unit, we held several meetings
to determine if we, in fact, needed to remove this information
from the website. The consensus was that we do. In addition, we
had many discussions on how to appropriately accomplish this
change.”
“We take seriously our
commitment to providing information to the public through the
website,” Judge Quinn added. “However, we also must comply with
federal law.”
The Judicial Branch does not
post similar information regarding protective orders, which are
used in criminal cases. Restraining orders are used in
non-criminal matters.
“Victims of domestic violence
seek orders of protection to keep them safe,’’ said Linda Blozie,
director of public affairs for the Connecticut Coalition Against
Domestic Violence. “It’s important to keep as much information
about them off the Web so that they cannot be tracked and
subjected to further abuse.”
Linda Cimino, director of the
Judicial Branch’s Office of Victim Services, added: “The
Internet is a vital tool, and often a lifeline, for crime
victims. Yet, for the victims of domestic violence, sexual
assault and stalking, who are named protected parties in
restraining orders, the Internet can become a vehicle for
continued harassment, stalking and abuse.”
For more information, contact
the External Affairs Division at 860-757-2270.
|