AC43140 - State v. Richards (Murder; whether evidence was sufficient to support conviction; "The defendant, Jermain V. Richards, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a third jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction and (2) the court erred in not giving a special credibility instruction applicable to the testimony of a cooperating witness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.")

AC41962 - State v. Prince A. (Sexual assault in first degree; sexual assault in fourth degree; risk of injury to child; constancy of accusation doctrine discussed; "The defendant, Prince A., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2), sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-73a (a) (1) (A) and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly admitted testimony of a constancy of accusation witness to refute any negative inferences the jury might have drawn from the victim's delay in reporting the sexual assault because that witness mistakenly believed that there had been no delay. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.")

AC40991 - State v. Bornstein (Interlocutory appeal; violation of civil protection order; harassment in second degree; motion to dismiss; claim that state was collaterally estopped from pursuing criminal charges because relevant factual allegations had been subject of full evidentiary hearing at hearing on request for civil protection order that was denied; lack of final judgment; "The defendant, David S. Bornstein, appeals from the denial of his motion to dismiss charges of harassment and violation of a civil protection order.The motion asserted that the state was collaterally estopped from pursuing the charges against him. The state argues that the defendant's appeal should be dismissed for lack of a final judgment or, in the alternative, denied on its merits. We agree with the state and dismiss the appeal.")