-
Committee and Membership.
The Chief Justice shall appoint a Committee on
Judicial Ethics (Committee) consisting of five
members. Four of the members shall be judges or
judge trial referees and one of the members shall be
a law professor who specializes in professional
ethics. The Chief Justice shall consider any
recommendations submitted by the Connecticut Judges
Association but shall not be bound by such
recommendations. Of the members first appointed, two
shall be for three years, two shall be appointed for
two years and one shall be appointed for one year.
On the expiration of the term of office of a
member, a successor shall be appointed for a term of
three years. Members may be reappointed to the
Committee, but no member shall be appointed to more
than two successive full three year terms. Members
shall continue to serve until a successor is
appointed, and appointments to fill a vacancy shall
be for the balance of the existing term. The Chief
Justice may revoke or suspend an appointment for
good cause as determined by the Chief Justice.
The Chief Justice may appoint one or more
alternate members to the Committee in such numbers
as may be necessary, in order that said Committee
may render efficient service in performing its
duties. An alternate member may be so appointed for
a period of up to three years and shall be a judge,
judge trial referee or a law professor who
specializes in professional ethics. An alternate
member may serve in place of a member of the
Committee at any time when so directed by the Chair
of the Committee, including but not limited to when
a member is unavailable or has a conflict of
interest, and while so serving shall have all the
powers and duties of members of the Committee.
Alternate members so appointed shall have power to
complete any matter pending at the expiration of the
term for which they were appointed. Alternate
members may be reappointed to additional terms as an
alternate for a maximum of six successive years.
Service as an alternate will not impact a persons’
eligibility for appointment as a regular member of
the Committee.
-
Powers and Duties. The Committee shall have
the power and duty to:
- render formal or
informal advisory opinions with respect to the
interpretation of rules of court and statutes
relating to the ethical and professional conduct
of judges, senior judges, judge trial referees,
family support magistrates and judicial or
family support magistrate nominees (hereinafter
collectively referred to as judicial officials,
persons subject to such judicial officials’
direction and control or over whom the judicial
official exercises supervisory responsibilities,
or the spouse or relatives of a judicial
official;
- make additional
procedural rules, as it deems necessary, in
addition to the procedural rules contained
herein;
- in January of
each year, submit to the Chief Justice and the
Superior Court judges a report of its
activities, together with any recommendations;
and
- publish on the
Judicial Branch website a current version of
this policy, its procedural rules, opinions
(subject to the limitations set forth below) and
such other information as it deems appropriate.
-
Administration. The Chief Justice shall
designate one of the members of the Committee as
Chairperson and another as Vice Chairperson. The
Chief Justice shall designate a staff attorney to
serve as the secretary and principal administrative
officer (hereinafter referred to as Secretary to the
Committee).
- A quorum of the
Committee shall consist of three members.
- The Committee
may render written opinions only by an
affirmative vote of at least three members.
- By rule the
Committee may delegate particular types of
matters, including the issuance of informal oral
opinions, to a lesser number of members or to
the Secretary to the Committee.
- The Secretary to
the Committee shall maintain a record of all
requests for opinions and the Committee’s
responses thereto.
- The members of
the Committee shall serve without compensation
but shall be reimbursed for necessary expenses
incurred in the performance of their official
duties.
-
Opinion Requests.
- A request for an
advisory opinion may be made only by a judicial
official.
- The Committee
shall not render opinions regarding the proposed
conduct of someone other than the person
submitting the request, except that the
Committee may respond to a request from a
judicial official about (i) a person subject to
a judicial official’s direction and control,
(ii) a person over whom a judicial official
exercises supervisory responsibilities, or (iii)
a judicial official’s spouse or relatives.
- The Committee
shall only issue opinions that address
contemplated or proposed future conduct and
shall not issue opinions addressing past or
current conduct unless the past or current
conduct relates to future conduct or is
continuing.
- Formal Advisory
Opinions. Requests for formal advisory opinions
shall be made by letter, addressed and emailed to the
Secretary or an Assistant Secretary to the Committee. The letter shall be
signed by the judicial official requesting the
advice and shall set forth fully all facts
bearing on the question or questions on which he
or she requests advice. Because the Committee
will not render opinions on issues pending
before a court, agency, or commission, including
the Judicial Review Council, or that relate to
past or current conduct unless such conduct
relates to future or continuing conduct, the
request shall contain an affirmation that, to
the best of the information and belief of the
judicial official requesting the opinion, no
issue raised thereby, whether in reference to
the requesting judicial official or to any other
person, is presently pending before any court,
agency, or commission and if it relates to past
or current conduct, such conduct relates to
future or continuing conduct. The judicial
official shall immediately notify the Secretary
to the Committee if the subject matter of the
request, subsequent to filing the request,
becomes the subject matter of a proceeding
before a court, agency or commission.
- Informal
Advisory Opinions. Requests for informal
advisory opinions shall be made by email to
the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary to the Committee. The request
shall contain the same information required for
a formal advisory opinion and there shall be the
same ongoing duty to inform if the subject of
the request becomes the subject of matter of a
proceeding before a court, agency or commission.
The Secretary to the Committee shall maintain a
sequentially numbered record, by calendar year,
of requests for informal opinions and the
responses thereto, but shall not include or
record the name of the requesting judicial
official or any personally identifiable
information concerning that judicial official. A
judicial official who has requested an informal
opinion may, at any time, request a formal
opinion concerning the subject matter of the
informal opinion by submitting a request in
writing that complies with the requirements of
paragraph 4d, above.
- Scope
of Question. Advisory opinion requests must
relate to the interpretation of rules of court
relating to the ethical and professional conduct of
(a) the requesting judicial official, (b) someone
subject to the requesting judicial official’s
direction and control, (c) someone over whom the
requesting judicial official exercises supervisory
responsibility, or (d) a spouse or relative of the
requesting judicial official. The Committee has
discretion to decline to answer questions for any
reason including those seeking opinions on
hypothetical questions or upon questions relating to
the conduct of persons other than the requesting
judicial official but no such request is precluded
by this policy.
-
Consideration of Requests. The Committee
shall render formal and informal advisory opinions
with respect to the interpretation of rules of court
relating to the ethical and professional conduct of
judicial officials, persons subject to their
direction and control, persons over whom they
exercise supervisory responsibility, or the spouse
or relative of a judicial official. Formal opinions
shall be in writing while informal opinions shall be
given orally. The Committee will not render opinions
on issues pending before a court, agency, or
commission, including but not limited to the
Judicial Review Council. The Committee may decline
to render an opinion for any reason that it deems
sufficient and shall have discretion to require that
an oral request for an informal opinion be submitted
in writing as a request for a formal opinion. The
Committee may request additional information for
purposes of clarification prior to rendering an
opinion.
-
Disclosure of Requests and Opinions. Unless
exempted from disclosure by legislation or a court
order, the Secretary to the Committee’s records of
requests for opinions and responses thereto,
including requests for formal opinions, formal
opinions, and the sequential record of requests and
responses, shall be public records. The Secretary to
the Committee shall not write in any records or
documents the name of the judicial official
requesting an informal opinion or personally
identifying information concerning any such judicial
official requesting an informal opinion. In
addition, except as authorized in paragraph 9,
below, or if ordered to do so by a court, the
Secretary to the Committee shall not disclose the
identity of any judicial official who requested or
is the subject of an informal advisory opinion.
-
Publication of Opinions.
The Committee may
publish its formal opinions or summaries of its
opinions.
- Non-binding.
All opinions shall be advisory in nature only. No
opinion shall be binding on the Judicial Review
Council or the Superior Court, Appellate Court or
Supreme Court in the exercise of their judicial
discipline responsibilities. The Secretary to the
Committee or a designee shall be available to
testify at any proceeding in which a judicial
official who requested an opinion seeks such
testimony on an issue related to the opinion that
was provided.
-
Reconsideration.
Within thirty days after
notice of a formal or an informal opinion, the
person who requested the opinion may petition the
Committee to reconsider its opinion by submitting a
request for reconsideration to the Secretary to the
Committee in the form of a letter or memorandum
explaining the basis for the request. The Committee
shall respond to the request by either reaffirming
or revising the opinion. If warranted, the Committee
may reconsider an opinion at any time on its own
motion.
*History: The Policy was amended by
the Chief Justice, effective May 24, 2010, to
eliminate the following language in Section 1: “and
is not engaged in the practice of law other than in
the federal courts as part of the professor’s
teaching responsibilities.”
Section 10 of the Policy
was amended by the Chief Justice, effective February
14, 2011, to clarify the process for the
reconsideration of informal opinions.
Section 1 of the Policy was amended by the Chief Justice, effective April 5, 2011, to include a paragraph regarding the appointment of one or more alternates.
Committee on Judicial Ethics
|