Skip to Main Content
Connecticut Judicial Branch
español   |   polski   |   português
The mission of the Connecticut Judicial Branch is to serve the interests of justice and the public by resolving matters brought before it in a fair, timely, efficient and open manner.
  • Home
  • Americans with Disabilities (ADA)
  • Case Look-up
  • Court Service Centers
  • Courts
  • Directories
  • Divorce
  • E-Services
  • Forms
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Law Libraries
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
  • Opinions
  • Opportunities
  • Self-Help
  • Statistics / Reports
  • Traffic Tickets
Judicial HOME
Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Case Look-up
  • Case Look-up Home
  • Supreme and Appellate
  • Civil / Family / Housing / Small Claims
  • Criminal / Motor Vehicle
  • Housing Sessions
  • Centralized Small Claims Case Look-up
Court Service Centers Courts
  • Courts Home
  • Supreme Court
  • Appellate Court
  • Superior Court
  • Probate Court
CT Remote Guide Directories
  • Directories Home
  • Administration - PDF
  • Adult Probation
  • Bail Services
  • Court Service Centers
  • Court Support Services
  • Directions
  • Family Services
  • Family Support Magistrates
  • Geographical Areas
  • Housing
  • Judges
  • Judicial Districts
  • Juvenile Detention
  • Juvenile Matters - PDF
  • Juvenile Probation
  • Law Libraries
  • Magistrates - PDF
  • Probate Courts
  • Small Claims
  • Staff Phone Directory
  • State Marshals
  • Support Enforcement
Divorce E-Services FAQs
  • FAQ Home
  • Adult Probation
  • Bail
  • Child Support
  • Connecticut Law Journal
  • Court Records
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Violence
  • Family
  • Foreclosure
  • Jury Service
  • Juvenile Probation
  • Juvenile Residential Services
  • Landlord/Tenant/ Housing
  • Language Help (LEP)
  • Law Libraries FAQs
  • Legal Clinics and Help
  • Minimum Continuing Legal Education
  • Representing Yourself
  • Small Claims
  • Traffic Violations
  • Victim Services
  • What is CSSD?
Forms Law Libraries
  • Law Libraries Home
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Doses of CT Legal History
  • Find a Library
  • How do I?
  • Law by Subject
  • Law Libraries FAQs
  • NewsLog
  • Public Records Online
  • Representing Yourself
  • Research Guides
Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) Opinions
  • Opinions Home
  • Supreme Court
  • Appellate Court
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Connecticut Law Journal
  • Ethics Advisory
  • Family Support Magistrate Decisions
  • Grievance Decisions
  • Tax Decisions
Opportunities
  • Opportunities Home
  • Bid Opportunities
  • Court Aide
  • Experiential Learning Programs
  • Job Openings
  • Job Shadow
  • Volunteer Program
Self-Help
  • Self-Help Home
  • Common Legal Words
  • Court Rules
  • Court Service Centers
  • Forms
  • How Do I?
  • Law Libraries
  • Legal Clinics and Help
  • Public Information Desks
  • Publications/Videos
  • Representing Yourself
  • Small Claims
  • Where to File
Statistics / Reports
  • Statistics Home
  • Adult Probation
  • Arrest Warrants
  • Bar Examination
  • Civil Cases
  • Criminal / Motor Vehicle
  • DUI Cases
  • Family Cases
  • Family Support Magistrate
  • Fiscal Reports
  • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Interpreter Services
  • Jury Administration
  • Juvenile Cases
  • Juvenile Detention
  • Protective / Restraining Orders
  • RBA Report Cards
  • Small Claims Cases
Traffic Tickets
  CT SAVIN  
a  r

Connecticut Judicial Branch
Quick Links
Law Day Home  |  Supreme Court
Video of Law Day Program - from CT-N

American Democracy and the Rule of Law: Why Every Vote Matters
Law Day 2014

  • Dr. Douglas M. Spencer delivers the keynote address.
  • Kimberly A. Knox, president of the Connecticut Bar Association, addresses the audience.
  • Students from Hartford and Bloomfield pose with Associate Justice Carmen E. Espinosa.
  • Dr. Spencer talks with students from Bloomfield and Hartford schools.
  • Dr. Spencer, Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers and Attorney Knox pose for a picture.
  • Attendees at the Supreme Court Law Day program applaud students from Bloomfield and Hartford.
Supreme Court Law Day Observance

The Importance of a Citizen’s Right to Vote and the Challenges Still Facing Many Americans

HARTFORD—When Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers welcomed all those gathered for the Connecticut Supreme Court’s 2014 Law Day ceremonies, May 2nd, she took a moment to reflect on this year’s theme—American Democracy and the Rule of Law: Why Every Vote Matters.

After welcoming members of the Connecticut Bar Association, fellow justices and high school students from Bloomfield and Hartford’s Capital Preparatory Magnet School, the Chief Justice said:

"As we look around the world, we see many people fighting for the freedom to select their own leaders. This is a right that we as Americans often take for granted. This is unfortunate because thousands of people from all walks of life have sacrificed their lives for this right."

"Regardless of your political affiliation, I think we can all agree on one thing—our forefathers intended this country to be defined as a democracy that elects its leaders by the people,"she added. “This is the social compact that the people make with the leaders of this country. In exchange, the people agree to some measure of authority over their lives by government. This is necessary to ensure an orderly society and highlights the importance of an individual vote."

On the 50th-year anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the eve of the 50th-year anniversary of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the American Bar Association, sponsors of Law Day throughout the country, ask all "…to reflect on the importance of a citizen’s right to vote and the challenges we still face in ensuring that all Americans have the opportunity to participate in our democracy."Pull Quote

Who better to address this notion than the Supreme Court’s Law Day Keynote Speaker, Professor Douglas M. Spencer, J.D., Ph.D., who is an expert on election law—with emphasis on election policies and the Voting Rights Act—and whose research currently focuses on the institutional regulation of elections at the intersection of law and political science.

Dr. Spencer opened by providing statistics on the percentage of eligible voters who turn out to vote for the president every four years (60 percent), Senators and Representatives during mid-term years (40 percent) and far fewer turn out to vote for state and local officials in off-years. In fact, Dr. Spencer noted, just five percent of eligible Hartford voters turned out for the latest School Board election.

"It makes you wonder, what would happen if we held an election and nobody showed up?" Dr. Spencer quipped.

But it is a statement, he believes, that is not far-fetched, particularly at the local election level.

He noted: "Abraham Lincoln once said, 'Elections belong to the people. It’s their decision. If they decide to turn their backs on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.'"

In other words, Dr. Spencer noted, "In virtually every election those who exercise their right to vote are far outnumbered by those who stay at home."

But there is a conundrum that exists between experts concerning those who vote and those who don’t, according to Dr. Spencer.

"To many, low turnout signals a general apathy about politics and undermines the legitimacy of our elected leaders who are elected by a minority of the population,” he explained. “Many people point to America’s low turnout as evidence that something is wrong with our electoral system. They may be right. On the other hand, the issue may be more nuanced."

Some scholars, he explained, say that non-voting could be a sign of contentment and a satisfied electorate. But Dr. Spencer took this a step further and said, “If the 40 percent of the population that votes is representative of the population as a whole, then the outcome of the election is both accurate and legitimate.

"What I would like to impress upon you today is the idea that the number of voters that turn out is less important than the representativeness of the voters that turn out."

He then pointed out that people with more education and high incomes are "far more likely" to vote than those with less advantages. Citing a quote in a study by Alexander Keyssar, he quoted, "The people who are least likely to be content or satisfied—and the most likely to need government help—are those who are least likely to vote."

Dr. Spencer discussed some of the obstacles that some voters—the poor, racial minorities, students (to name a few)—face such as restrictive voting laws, the push for photo IDs, redistricting, campaign finance, cutbacks to early voting and times that polls open and close, long lines and limited ballots.

"So the effect on turn out is uneven, meaning the laws could impact the outcome of an election," he said. "The fear of partisan distortion is what has fueled the controversy, not the burden on individual rights."

In closing, Dr. Spencer said: "Despite the various attacks on voting rights in recent years, the right to vote is available to nearly all adult citizens…As we celebrate the 50th anniversaries of the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act, we pause to think about the progress we’ve made with regards to voting rights, but also to find a renewed push to finish the task of making sure that every vote matters."

Attorney Kimberly Knox followed with an engaging discussion of Connecticut’s approach to voting rights through the years—including a proposed amendment at the 1818 Constitutional Convention by the State’s first Chief Justice Stephen Mix Mitchell—to eliminate "white male" from the eligibility requirement. This, she noted, "…would have effectively eliminated the race and sex limitation. But in the end, and by a narrow margin, the right to vote was preserved for all adult white men who paid taxes or had served in the military."

Read Attorney Knox’s entire speech - PDF  |   Read Dr. Spencer's entire speech - PDF

Top 
 

Home  |  Common Legal Words  |  Contact Us  |  Related Links  |  Site Index  |  Website Awards  |  Policies and Disclaimers  |  CT.gov  |  Public Defender Services
Connecticut Judicial Branch © 2017